Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Wanprestasi terhadap Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Hak Atas Tanah Milik Pihak Ketiga (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Klaten)

Maisaroh, Marisa Iffah and , Nuswardhani, S.H., S.U (2019) Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Wanprestasi terhadap Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Hak Atas Tanah Milik Pihak Ketiga (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Klaten). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

[img] PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf

Download (826kB)
[img] PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf

Download (378kB)
[img] PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf

Download (284kB)
[img] PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (370kB)
[img] PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (334kB)
[img] PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (102kB)
[img] PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (205kB)
[img] PDF (Surat Pernyataan)
SURAT PERNYATAAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (190kB)

Abstract

Abstract A Credit Agreement is a contract made between a Creditor and the Debtor with Land Right as Collateral owned by third parties. Debtor fail to repay the loan so Creditor got some tort then submits a claim to the District Court on the basic of Default in a Credit Agreement with Land Right as Collateral owned by third parties. Therefore this research by the writer aims to knows Process Finishing the Case to a Default as a Credit Agreement with Land Right as Collateral owned by third parties start from decides verification, Judge comparation in order to decides the case then Law Caused. This research uses a normative approach caused is examined rule by the law in a Process Finishing the Case to a Default, legal principles or legal doctrins on the basic of a consideration until the core of logic Verdict.The type of this research applying descriptive research, because a study types about describing a law events or a law condition. The result of this study is a Credit Agreement constitute a Credit which is the participant give an object with a same quantity. The point from Credit Agreement was disavowed by a Debtor then Creditor submit sue to the District Court and Debtor is stated by Judge. The Plaintiffcan prove the arguments of the Claim so it can be proven. Meanwhile, Defendant I and Defendant II can not prove the arguments and Defendant III were not proven as a Default because Defendant III was Collateral owner which is used by Defendant I and Defendant II to do a Credit Agreementso the Judge decides cut off to grant a half from the Plaintiff Claim. Law Caused by this case are the Defendant I and the Defendant II is stated Default and must indemnify in concurrent and pay the cost case. Key Word : credit agreement case, default, finishing the case in the district court

Item Type: Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords: credit agreement case, default, finishing the case in the district court
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User: MARISA IFFAH MAISAROH
Date Deposited: 18 Nov 2019 02:41
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2019 02:41
URI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/78810

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item