Maisaroh, Marisa Iffah and , Nuswardhani, S.H., S.U (2019) Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Wanprestasi terhadap Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Hak Atas Tanah Milik Pihak Ketiga (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Klaten). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (826kB) |
|
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (378kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (284kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (370kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (334kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (102kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (205kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan)
SURAT PERNYATAAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (190kB) |
Abstract
Abstract A Credit Agreement is a contract made between a Creditor and the Debtor with Land Right as Collateral owned by third parties. Debtor fail to repay the loan so Creditor got some tort then submits a claim to the District Court on the basic of Default in a Credit Agreement with Land Right as Collateral owned by third parties. Therefore this research by the writer aims to knows Process Finishing the Case to a Default as a Credit Agreement with Land Right as Collateral owned by third parties start from decides verification, Judge comparation in order to decides the case then Law Caused. This research uses a normative approach caused is examined rule by the law in a Process Finishing the Case to a Default, legal principles or legal doctrins on the basic of a consideration until the core of logic Verdict.The type of this research applying descriptive research, because a study types about describing a law events or a law condition. The result of this study is a Credit Agreement constitute a Credit which is the participant give an object with a same quantity. The point from Credit Agreement was disavowed by a Debtor then Creditor submit sue to the District Court and Debtor is stated by Judge. The Plaintiffcan prove the arguments of the Claim so it can be proven. Meanwhile, Defendant I and Defendant II can not prove the arguments and Defendant III were not proven as a Default because Defendant III was Collateral owner which is used by Defendant I and Defendant II to do a Credit Agreementso the Judge decides cut off to grant a half from the Plaintiff Claim. Law Caused by this case are the Defendant I and the Defendant II is stated Default and must indemnify in concurrent and pay the cost case. Key Word : credit agreement case, default, finishing the case in the district court
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | credit agreement case, default, finishing the case in the district court |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
Depositing User: | MARISA IFFAH MAISAROH |
Date Deposited: | 18 Nov 2019 02:41 |
Last Modified: | 18 Nov 2019 02:41 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/78810 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |