Auliani, Devita and , Nuswardhani, S.H, S.U (2019) Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Terhadap Perkara Wanprestasi Jual Beli Beras Penggugat Sebagai Penjual Beras Dan Jual Beli Tanah Tergugat Sebagai Penjual Tanah (Studi Kasus Pn Karanganyar). Skripsi thesis, Universitas muhammadiyah surakarta.
![[img]](http://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI DEVITA.pdf Download (865kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN DEVITA.pdf Download (710kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (173kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (221kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (270kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (156kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (90kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan)
SURAT PERNYATAAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (184kB) |
Abstract
In initiated rice trading, it changed to be land trading has been agreement between seller and buyer containing the debt payment of the rice trading paid by land trading agreed on 18 April 2017 and the trading bind was on 25 April 2017, which the maximum payment was on 31 January 2018. The content of the agreement, on the land buyer’s opinion, was that the seller tricked the buyer because the price offered was not suitable with the expectation. Herewith, the buyer proposed pursuit to the regional court (Pengadilan Negeri) in case of tort law, then the claimed proposed back pursuit of tort law due to the buyer did not pay the debt at the determined time. Therefore, the study aimed: to know the process of trading legally and if there was mistaken; it would propose pursuit, to know the consideration in proving, to know the consideration on jury decision. It used law normative approach due to the study investigated law aspects, rules or law norms. The study was descriptive describing entirely and systematically the process of solving tort law case of rice trading by the claimed and land trading by the claimer. The result of the study showed that rice trading legally had to fulfilled the content of the agreement, but the buyer felt lost because of the trick conducted by the seller and he proposed pursuit to the Regional court, the case investigation in the court was that the proving was not true that the claimed did tort law. In back suit, it showed that the land trading legally must fulfilled the content of the agreement, but the buyer did not pay iat the determined time, the case investigation in court indicated that the claimed did tort law, the claimer reconvention proved the suit statement and convention claimer could not prove the suit statement. The jury decided that convention claimer was rejected and the reconvention suit was given in part as well as the reconvention claimed was fined the initial payment given was lost and paid the case process.
| Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | rice trading, land trading, case solving in regional court |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
| Depositing User: | DEVITA AULIANI |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Jul 2019 03:00 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Jul 2019 03:01 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/74915 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
