Novianingsih, Yurika Nendri and , Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum (2018) Teachers’ Oral Corrective Feedback In Speaking Class At English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NENDRI NASPUB FULL EDITED.pdf Download (487kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
Front Page.pdf Download (409kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
chapter 1.pdf Download (227kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
chapter 2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (220kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
chapter 3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (166kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
chapter 4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (247kB) |
|
PDF (Bab V)
chapter 5.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (165kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
reference.pdf Download (216kB) |
|
PDF (Lampiran)
appendix.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (291kB) |
|
PDF (Pernyataan Publikasi)
pernyataan publikasi.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (131kB) |
Abstract
In this study, the researcher only focused in speaking class of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. This study aimed to describe the type, frequency, and dominant of corrective feedback by teachers to students. The method which was used by the researcher was qualitative descriptive. This method used the students and teachers as the subject of the study and used the recording of their activities when they learned in the class. The record contained information about the corrective feedback from the teachers to the students. Class observation was carried out seven times in two months. The researcher observed in four classes of two teachers. The result of this study, many errors were done by the students when they practiced speaking in front of the class. The most common errors were pronunciation and grammar. Many types of errors were made by the students, but the most dominant corrective feedbacks which were made by teachers were metalinguistic and repetition. The percentages of each typemof corrective feedback is 30.26% in metalinguistic feedback with 23 data, 30.26% in repetition with 23 data, 18.42% in explicit correction with 14 data, 10.26% in elicitation with 8 data,7.90% in recast with 6 data, and 2.64% in clarification requests with 2 data. The implication of using feedback in learning strategies was that students could be better to speak foreign language. Students also could develop their skill to speak foreign languages.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | corrective feedback, speaking, types of corrective feedback, frequency and dominant types of corrective feedback |
Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris |
Depositing User: | YURIKA NENDRI NOVIANINGSIH |
Date Deposited: | 13 Nov 2018 03:25 |
Last Modified: | 13 Nov 2018 03:25 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/68787 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |