Studi Komparasi Hasil Belajar Matematika Menggunakan Pendekatan Terbuka Dan Tertutup Siswa Kelas VIII Smp Negeri 2 Plupuh Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016

Astuti, Winda and , Idris Harta M.A., Ph.D (2016) Studi Komparasi Hasil Belajar Matematika Menggunakan Pendekatan Terbuka Dan Tertutup Siswa Kelas VIII Smp Negeri 2 Plupuh Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

[img] PDF (NASKAH PUBLIKASI)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf

Download (750kB)
[img] PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf

Download (605kB)
[img] PDF (BAB I)
BAB 1.pdf

Download (98kB)
[img] PDF (BAB II)
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (118kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (BAB III)
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (347kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (BAB IV)
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (338kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (BAB V)
BAB V.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (88kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (135kB)
[img] PDF (LAMPIRAN)
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (3MB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI)
SURAT PERNYATAAN NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (145kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The aim of this study was to know the difference of the result of mathematic learning between using open and close approach for grade VIII students of SMPN 2 Plupuh in 2015/2016 academic year. The kind of the study based on quantitative approach. The population of this study was grade VIII students of SMPN 2 Plupuh. The sample of this study was 62 students which chosen using cluster random sampling technique. The method that was used in collecting data were test and documentation. The analysis technique used T-test which needed requirement test, homogenity test and normality test. Based on the study of data analysis with 5% of significance, we get the result tcount = 2,303 > ttable = 1,671, therefore the condision, H0 was not appropriate. It means there was difference mean between using open and close approach. Therefore we could conclude that the learning result using open approach was better than using close approach.

Item Type: Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords: learning result, close approach, open approach.
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1603 Secondary Education. High schools
Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Matematika
Depositing User: WINDA ASTUTI
Date Deposited: 10 Aug 2016 06:17
Last Modified: 10 Aug 2016 06:17
URI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/45409

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item