Wahyudi, Agung Try and , Nuswardhani, S.H.,S.U., and , Septarina Budiwati, S.H.,C.N.,M.H., (2016) Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Hibah Atas Harta Bersama Suami Dan Istri (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Karanganyar). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![[img]](http://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN)
03.Halaman Judul.pdf Download (384kB) |
|
PDF (BAB I)
04.Bab 1.pdf Download (114kB) |
|
PDF (BAB II)
05.Bab 2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (253kB) |
|
PDF (BAB III)
06.BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (222kB) |
|
PDF (BAB IV)
07.BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (12kB) |
|
PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
08.DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (9kB) |
|
PDF (NASKAH PUBLIKASI)
02. Naskah Publikasi.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (309kB) |
|
PDF (SURAT PERNYATAAN)
01.Surat Pernyataan.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (522kB) |
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the consideration of the judge in determining the evidence and take a decision in the case of grants the joint property in the District Court Karanganyar and legal consequences. This research includes normative legal research is to examine the legal principles used in resolving disputes grants. Research conducted at the District Court Karanganyar. Source data using secondary data from the literature study. Data were analyzed using qualitative analysis. The results showed that: First, the judge in determining the consideration of evidence on the case of grants the joint property in the District Court in the case No. Karanganyar 52 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PN.KRAY is Plaintiff stating that SHM 2717 land grant of Defendant I to Defendant II is not valid, the defendant denial that hubah a change of land and homes ever sold by the Defendant I, as well as the conclusions of evidence by the judges stating that the object in the grant agreement contained in the deed of grant No. 108 of 2009 is something forbidden because that is declared null and void; Secondly, the consideration of judges in decisions on matters of common property grants in Karanganyar District Court in case No. 52 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PN.KRAY is the conclusion of the verification conducted by the Plaintiff, the denial of the defendant, the provisions of the legislation, as well as the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court ruling. Panel of Judges in its decision to grant the Plaintiff's claim for partial; Third, the legal consequences of the joint property of the Plaintiff and Defendant I, which has been granted the Defendant I to Defendant II in case No. 52 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PN.KRAY this deed of grant No. 108 of 2009 is null and void because the donated land is a treasure shared between the Plaintiff and the Defendant I were not divided, so that the plaintiff still has the right to object grants. Keywords: grant a dispute over joint property, consideration of the judge, the legal consequences
| Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | grant a dispute over joint property, consideration of the judge, the legal consequences |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with username c100100128 |
| Date Deposited: | 26 Jan 2016 08:31 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Mar 2017 09:58 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/40480 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
