Eksekusi Pidana Pembayaran Ganti Kerugian dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Surakarta)

Nugroho, Topik Adi and , H. Hartanto, S.H., M.Hum and , Muchamad Iksan, S.H., M.H (2015) Eksekusi Pidana Pembayaran Ganti Kerugian dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Surakarta). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img] PDF (NASKAH PUBLIKASI)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf

Download (744kB)
[img] PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf

Download (2MB)
[img] PDF (BAB I)
BAB I.pdf

Download (165kB)
[img] PDF (BAB II)
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (182kB)
[img] PDF (BAB III)
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (267kB)
[img] PDF (BAB IV)
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (53kB)
[img] PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (54kB)
[img] PDF (PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (805kB)

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the role and constraints Surakarta State Attorney in the criminal execution payment of compensation in cases of corruption. The method used is empirical juridical approach that is descriptive. Types and sources of data comprising primary and secondary data is literature study and interviews. Data were collected through library research and interview, and then analyzed by qualitative analysis method. The results showed Role of Prosecutors in implementing the court decision on criminal execution payment of compensation in cases of corruption that have legal force continues to run well. This is based on the task of Attorney as executor for execution in accordance with the rules of the existing legislation. Treasure / or confiscated assets belonging to the convicted person then submitted to KPKNL to do an auction where the proceeds of the auction are used to cover the financial loss to the state. Regarding obstacles State Attorney Surakarta in executions payment of compensation in cases of corruption, there are actually no barriers faced by the public prosecutor in the State Attorney Surakarta in executions payment of compensation in cases of corruption, particularly related to the execution of the auction in order to pay compensation state finances. This can happen in general convicted person has paid the state financial losses prior to read out their demands, so during the investigation process in the prosecution of the accused are already returning results Attorney corruption is the country's financial losses.

Item Type: Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords: execution, payment of compensation, corruption
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User: Unnamed user with username c100110217
Date Deposited: 02 Nov 2015 11:03
Last Modified: 12 Oct 2021 06:47
URI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/38833

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item