Perdana, Rama Meika and , Darsono, S.H.,M.Hum (2022) Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Kasus Wanprestasi Perjanjian Kerjasama (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 192/Pdt.G/2019/PN Skt Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![[img]](http://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (353kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (754kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (730kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (730kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (731kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (730kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (730kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (30kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
The default occurred because the plaintiff Agung Sutrisno entered into a business cooperation agreement for basic household needs with the defendant Rosi Wardhana with the plaintiff as a capital provider by lending capital to the defendant and it would be returned after 24 months along with profit sharing money every month but the defendant was only able to run 10 months and the plaintiff have tried to ask for a refund and profit sharing but the defendant still does not give it even after the plaintiff has subpoenaed 3 times. This cooperation agreement starts from a difference or unequal interest between the parties concerned. Understanding Cooperation Agreement Cooperation agreement is the agreement of the parties to make achievements, and give rise to a contractual relationship (rights and obligations) of the parties in achieving common goals. In this cooperation agreement, there are capital owners and business managers. In the agreement there are rights and obligations for the parties who carry out the agreement. If one of the parties does not carry out things that are not their rights and obligations in accordance with the contents of the agreement, then the negligence can cause someone to be sued in court. The act of not carrying out the contents of the agreement in legal science is called default. This study aims to find out how the judge's considerations in making decisions on civil default cases and to find out that the decision has been in accordance with the law and has touched a sense of justice for the community. The method of collecting data is through literature study by searching, recording, taking inventory, studying, and analyzing the data, then the data is analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study explain that in carrying out legal considerations in the civil breach of contract case Number 192/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Skt, it is in accordance with aspects of legal justice, legal benefits, aspects of legal certainty and is in accordance with the principles of the decision in article 178 HIR and Article 50 of Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Perjanjian Kerjasama, Wanprestasi, Pertimbangan Hakim |
| Subjects: | K Law K Law > KI Indonesia > KN Pidana |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
| Depositing User: | RAMA MEIKA PERDANA |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Jul 2022 02:21 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Jul 2022 02:21 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/101432 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
